TJD X-Gen and X-Track Parts Documents

What this page is for

Somebody owns a TJD system. It is on the machine, it is out of production, a slide is worn or a bolt pattern needs an adapter, and every search returns either a retailer with nothing in stock or a forum thread from a decade ago. The single most useful thing anybody can hand that person is the document. So: where the documents are, and what they cover.

One limit worth knowing before you read on. No application list for these systems is published anywhere we could reach, so nothing here says whether a TJD system fits a particular quad — only what the parts on the one you already own are called, and where the procedures for them are.

There is nothing to look your machine up in

The two references that answer this question for current systems both come back empty for TJD: 0 application rows in the fitment catalogue read 2026-09-26, and 0 serial families in the Camso serial reference read 2026-09-26.

So there is no application to look up, no serial family to match a plate against, and no sprocket pair or suspension field to read off. If you arrived with a serial number, it will not resolve anywhere — photograph the plate instead and work from the part names in the archive below. What the empty rows do not mean is that the hardware is undocumented.

The manufacturer hosts an archive, and it is substantial

Camso publishes a TJD replacement-parts page inside its own ATV/UTV service-and-support section, read 2026-09-26. It is a flat index of PDF documents, organised into folders keyed by document code rather than by machine. The documents are bilingual, French and English, with the language marked in the filename where both exist.

The TJD parts page on camso.co is the index itself. Two folders correspond to the two systems this page is named for, and the rest are part-type folders shared across them. Grouped by kind, this is what it holds:

That is more than a courtesy page. Procedure documents for hub installation, for adjusting a differential cable, for removing protection and for removing a bumper are the kind of material that usually disappears with a discontinued product, and they are the kind an owner in a shed in February actually needs.

Two things about finding your way around it. The organising key is the document-code folder, and the page names no vehicle make or model anywhere — so if the number you are holding is a track length, it is not the key the index uses, and your system’s own folder is where to start instead. One system’s section is divided further into variants, and the labels on those variants carry a figure whose unit the page does not state, so match the variant by comparing it with what is bolted to the machine rather than by the number.

What the archive answers, and what it does not

Worth being precise about, because the gap between the two is where somebody orders the wrong thing.

• It answers what a part is called. That is the hard problem with orphaned hardware, and a named component with a document behind it can be described to a parts desk whether or not the desk has heard of the brand.
• It answers how some jobs are done— the procedure documents above, one per job.
• It does not answer whether a part fits a given machine. Read on the date above, the page names no vehicle make or model and publishes no application list. Nothing there maps a component to a quad.
• It publishes no statement about availability. No note about production, about discontinuation, or about whether anything in it can still be ordered appeared on the page we read. A document archive is not a stock list, and the presence of a PDF says nothing about whether the part behind it exists on a shelf.

Do not take “no factory parts” as the end of it

A guide covering these systems states, of TJD:

No factory parts are available from the manufacturer.utvtracks.com, TJD system entry, read 2026-09-26

No source is given for it there, and it is the kind of line that makes an owner stop looking. Two published things sit against it. The manufacturer’s own service-and-support section hosts the parts archive described above, read the same day. And a 2023 Camso parts price file, read 2026-09-26, carries part lines naming TJD — identification decals for both of these systems by name among them, along with hub and adaptor hardware.

A 2023 supplier price file is not a stock list and not a current price list. What it does establish is that the manufacturer catalogued TJD parts under its own brand recently enough to be worth a phone call. Nobody publishes an availability statement either way, so the only way to find out about a specific part is to name it and ask.

Used hardware is the other route, and it works better asked by part than by system. A hub adaptor, a set of slides or a rubber kit off a machine somebody is breaking is a realistic find; a complete TJD system coming up for sale is not something to wait for. The document name from the archive is what makes a listing identifiable, so have it before you start looking.

Ask any seller for photographs of the frame decal and of the mount where it meets the hub. TJD hardware gets confused with Camoplast-era systems, which are a different family with their own diagrams — Camoplast Tatou and Tatou Original is the page for those.

A third designation, and nothing published defines it

For a minority of owners this is the whole answer. Two designations are folder names in the archive above: X-Gen and X-Track. A third, XT4S, turns up in the paperwork and is in neither folder.

Where it turns up — all read 2026-09-26:

• The 2023 Camso parts price file carries a substantial run of XT4Slines — upper carriers, a tensioner bushing, a track guide, frame sub-kits, and four separate suspension-conversion kits where a single-configuration system would need one. Several of those lines are prefixed ATV, which makes this a quad’s problem rather than a side-by-side’s.
• One line in that same file names XGEN 4S and XT4S together on a single conversion kit. It puts the two designations side by side and says nothing about what either one is.
• The published parts-diagram index carries a small set of diagram groups under the name XT4S— one track model year, quad-typed, filed under the older brand. That is real per-year documentation under a designation that does not appear in the manufacturer’s archive at all.
• One component line in the published parts data names XTRACK 4S in full and pairs it with a current Camso system in its side-by-side form. That is the only place the full name turns up.

Nothing published defines the abbreviation, so do not assume it expands to either name. It reads like a contraction of one of them, and in the manufacturer’s own file those two designations appear as two names on one line — which is the opposite of evidence that they are the same thing. Guessing it is how somebody ends up at the wrong diagram and the wrong part.

The practical version, for the owner this affects: if the plate or decal on your system carries that designation, the two archive folders may not be where your documents are, and the per-year diagram groups filed under that name — one model year of them — may be. Ask a parts desk to search the abbreviation as well as both full names, and say the abbreviation is what is on the hardware. Check both rather than settling for whichever the first search returns.

What to do with a TJD system

In this order, because each step is cheaper than the one after it.

• Work out which of the two systems you haveand get to that folder in the archive. The two have separate document sets, and an X-Track owner’s manual is among the files — if it matches what is bolted to your machine, you have the single most useful document that exists for it.
• Photograph the frame decal and any plate, rather than reading a number out. There is no serial family to check a number against, so the photograph is the record.
• Name the part from the archive before you ring anybody. A named component with a document behind it is a conversation a parts desk can have. A description of a bracket is not.
• Photograph the mount kit where it meets the hub. On orphaned hardware the vehicle-specific mounting is the part most likely to be unobtainable and most likely to be fabricable, and that decision needs a picture rather than a name.
• Measure the wear parts before you ask about them. Slides, bushings and rubber kits all have folders in the archive, and a measurement alongside the document name is something a desk can cross-reference against current stock even when the brand means nothing to them.
• Then ask about sourcing, and treat the answer as the answer. Nothing published establishes whether a given part can still be had. Only the desk holding the stock knows.

If the system on the machine turns out not to be a TJD at all — which is a real possibility, because orphaned systems get mixed up with each other more than with current ones — an unmarked system in a barn starts from measurements instead of names, and older quads covers what parts documentation exists for the systems that do have serial families.

One last thing about that conversation. There is nothing to add to a cart for a TJD system, so the question is not “do you have this part” but “can this part be sourced, substituted or made”. Those are three different answers and a desk that has handled these systems can usually give all three at once: a slide or a bushing is often a current part under another name, a rubber kit is a measurement, and vehicle-specific mounting hardware is the piece most likely to end up at a fabricator. Go in with the document name, the photographs and the measurements, and expect the answer to be specific to the part rather than to the brand.