CForce, UForce, ZForce

Which of the three is the quad

CForce is the quad. UForce is the utility side-by-side, ZForce the sport side-by-side. That is the whole distinction, and it decides whether a published track application has anything to do with the machine standing in the shop.

Camso states it in the one place that matters for fitment. Its ATV/UTV application guide runs a single TYPE column down the page, and inside the one alphabetised block for this make the C Force rows are typed ATV while the U Force and Z Force rows are typed UTV. The block is not split by platform, so a reader scanning the make finds quad and side-by-side rows interleaved by displacement, and the two-letter type code is the only thing separating them.

This catalogue holds ATV rows only, which is why it shows 0rows whose title carries a UForce or ZForce name. Camso’s guide carries plenty of both, typed UTV — so an empty result here says nothing about side-by-side coverage.

The published quad rows are collected under CFMOTO track applications. If a fitment search lands you on a page whose subject is a UForce or a ZForce, you are looking at a side-by-side and the kits listed on it are not yours. Check the model name in the page title against the badge on your fender before you read any further into it.

The make is filed under a string neither spelling will match

The make field on these records holds CF moto — a space, and a lower-case second word. An equality match on CFMOTO against that field returns 0 of 1389 of the records here. The rows are all there; the string is not the one a buyer would type.

This is not a typo in a listing. Camso’s own application guide prints the make the same way in its make column, so the published applications are carrying the track manufacturer’s spelling through unchanged. The vehicle manufacturer styles its own name as one capitalised word, and that string appears in neither document.

The practical consequence is that the make box is the wrong place to start. Search the model name instead, and search it in both of the spellings below.

The model line is spelled two ways, one per manufacturer

Having found the make, the model name splits again — and this time the split runs cleanly along the two track manufacturers. Camso writes the model as two words. Kimpex writes it as one. Neither writes it the way the vehicle manufacturer does.

The consequence is arithmetic rather than opinion. A search on one spelling returns one manufacturer’s applications and none of the other’s, and a search on the brand’s own styling returns none at all. Nothing on either manufacturer’s side is wrong; the two are simply not the same string, and a fitment search is a string match.

Some rows do not carry the word Force at all

A reader who has worked out both spellings still misses a block of rows, because the earlier machines and the rebadged units are published under names that predate the current model line. These titles are published for this make and contain no form of the word:

• 500 Yukon (2006)
• CF500 Moose Tracker (2007-2009)
• CF500A Moose Tracker (2007-2009)
• Trail Tracker EX500 carb (2011-2012)
• Trail Tracker EX500 EFI (2010-2014)
• Trail Tracker EX600 EFI (2010-2013)
• X6 Terralander 625 LWB (2011-2012)
• X6 Terralander 625 SWB (2011-2012)
• X8 Terralander 800 (2012-2013)
• X8 Terralander 800 EPS (2014)
• X8 Terralander 800 WT (2014)

Those are titles to search, not a model history. Which are rebadges, which are export-only variants and which are separate machines is a question for the vehicle manufacturer — but if the badge on your fender reads any of them, that is the string to put in the box.

Where the two published year spans disagree

One row is dated differently by the two manufacturers, on the same machine. For the Overland, the Camso rows here span 2021–2023 and the Kimpex row spans 2021–2024.

Camso’s own application guide, in the August 2026 revision, carries that row from model year 2021 up to model year 2024, and then opens a second row for the two model years after it. So the guide agrees with the Kimpex end year rather than with the span the published applications hold against the Camso rows. Read 2026-09-26.

Both spans are printed because the sources disagree. If your machine sits at either end of that span, confirm the year against the live catalogue before you order: a model year that falls outside a published row is the difference between a kit that has an adapter and one that does not.

The conditions published against the quad rows

8 of the 69 machine rows for this make carry at least one manufacturer condition. Across them the published flags are Permanent interference, Temporary Vehicle modification and Temporary body parts removal.

Camso publishes the flag and the legend definition of the letter behind it. It does not publish what physically interferes, what has to come off, or whether it goes back on, for any individual machine — so if a flag sits on your row, ask the shop fitting the set what comes off your machine and whether it goes back on, before you order. What each flag turns out to mean in practice is collected in Field Notes.

Kimpex publishes no per-application condition data at all: every Commander WS4 record in this catalogue has an empty remarks field. The absence of a WS4 entry below means nobody has published a condition for it — not that none exists. Camso is the only manufacturer here that publishes these flags, so this page is necessarily a Camso view of the catalogue.

Ordering for a CForce

A catalogue search is not the fitment answer on this make, because a search that returned half the rows looks exactly like a search that returned all of them. What to do instead:

• Search the model name, not the make. The make string here will not match what you type, and the model name will — in one of two spellings.
• Try both spellings, spaced and joined, and then try the older names in the list above. Each returns one manufacturer’s rows and gives no sign the other exists.
• Quote the model year off the VIN and the displacement, not the model name on its own. Rows are filed by year span, and the Overland span is dated differently by the two sources.
• Check that the row you are looking at is a quad row. A UForce or ZForce row is a side-by-side and its kit is not yours.
• If nothing comes back, that is no published application for the string you searched — not a statement that the machine will not fit. Have the year and displacement checked against the current applications before you conclude anything from an empty result.